MATERIAL AND METHODS

I. Manually isolated polytene chromosomes and nuclear envelopes

Polytene chromosomes and NEs were manually isolated from Chironomus tentans salivary glands as described by Plagens (1978). Bulk-isolated rat liver nuclei were subjected to a similar treatment (Berezney and Coffey, 1974, 1976) for comparison.

1. The mica technique

Mica can be cleaved into very thin sheets with a perfectly smooth surface. Being highly hydrophilic it is ideally suited for attaching chromosomes, nuclear envelopes (NEs) and nuclei. The finest details at the limits of light microscopic resolution, before, during or after extraction and enzyme treatments, can then be followed with phase contrast or fluorescence (below). Cracks and crystalline inclusions which occur naturally in mica, can be used as pointers to locations where chromosomes and other material had been attached before extraction and digestion. After rotary Pt-carbon shadowing (see below), as an example, the area of interest can be encircled (Leitz diamond marker), and after detaching the replica, be selectively taken up on a grid for EM inspection.

Isolated polytene chromosomes, NEs or nuclei were transferred by pipetting in storage buffer [0.09 M KCl, 0.06 M NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.2), 0.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM phenylmethyl sulphonylfluoride (PMSF, Sigma), 0.08% Triton X-100, 0.13% Nonidet P40] to freshly cleaved mica pieces (about 5 x 10 mm), which were kept on depression slides placed on a cold stage (2-5oC) of a preparation microscope. They were allowed to settle and attached in less than a minute. A few successful pilot experiments were also done on cover glasses freshly etched with 4% fluoric acid (HF), 10 min.

If the extraction and digestion were monitored by incident fluorescence microscopy, the material was stained with ethidium bromide 0.5-10 µg per ml (for 1-20 min), or for more specific DNA staining with DAPI (4“-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole: 0.25-0.5 µg per ml) in 2 M salt solution (see salt extraction) used for extraction, before the digestion steps.

2. Treatment procedures

2. 1. Salt extraction

The chromosomes, NEs and nuclei were extracted for 30 to 60 min at 4oC with: 2 M NaCl, 50 mM EDTA, 0.5-1% Triton X-100 and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.O; this solution will be called 2 M salt solution or 2MS. This salt extraction was followed by two changes of the same salt solution.

2. 2. Enzyme digestions

For enzyme digestions, the material was gently washed three times with the specific buffer (see below). The buffer was replaced by the enzyme solution. The following enzyme digestions were done singly or in sequence (two washings with buffer): (1) RNase A (Boehringer), 500 µg/ml, 0.1 M Na-acetate buffer pH 5.2, 15-30 min, at room temperature. (2) DNase I (Boehringer), 10-100 µg/ml, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 5-10 mM MgCl2 buffer, pH 7.4, 30-60 min at room temperature. (3) hyaluronidase (Hyalas, Leo, Helsingborg Sweden, highly purified, no protease activity; specific activity 20 000 IU/mg) at 50-100 µg/ml or an ampoule of 200 IU in 100-150 µl of buffer for each mica piece, for 60 min at room temperature in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 5-10 mM MgCl2, buffer.

The absence of protease activity in the hyaluronidase preparation was demonstrated by incubating it with 125I labeled bovine serum albumin and analysing the incubation mixture by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

The absence of DNase activity was demonstrated by incubating 2.5 µg of plasmid pBR 322 DNA for 5, 10, 20, or 60 min at 20oC in 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, with 50 µg per ml of Hyalas and analysis on agarose gel electrophoresis.

The 2MS and other solutions contained, as a 0.5 mM solution, PMSF, which was added freshly from a 1 M stock solution in ethanol; yet no difference was noticed when PMSF was omitted.

2. 3. Washing, dehydration and staining

After any of the above treatments, the mica pieces were thoroughly washed with the buffers, then they were mostly (especially if DNA was going to be visualized by Pt shadowing) treated with cytochrome c (Boehringer) in water (100 µg/ml). This treatment was based on the observation that the basic protein cytochrome c seems to have a preserving effect on fine-structural details, also after DNase, in carbon-coated preparations. This was followed by rinsing in water, dehydration in methanol, staining for 30 sec with 1-2 % uranyl acetate in methanol, washing in methanol and air drying.

3. EM preparations

The pieces were then either coated with (evaporated) carbon or rotary-shadowed (7-8 degree angle) with Pt and carbon. For electron microscopy, the preparations were detached from mica (or glass) with warm (50-60oC) 0.4-4% HF solution (modified from Ruzicka, 1974). This could be replaced by the more efficient warm (50-60oC) 0.1 N NaOH for Pt replicas. For the carbon film only, HF was preferable as the material appeared to be better preserved giving more contrast.

After detachment, the preparations were washed with water (transfered with the mica piece, plastic or wooden rod), and mounted on grids (75-100 mesh) with formvar and carbon support or (200 mesh grids) without it.

Mounting was done by floating selected, encircled replica pieces of the preparations on a drop in a wire loop, about 3 mm in diameter, slightly larger than a grid. After applying the loop over a grid, held in place by capillarity forces, the water was sucked off with a filter paper.

4. EM stereoscopy and prints

EM stereo plates (micrographs) were taken with Philips 400, 410 LS, or Zeiss 109 electron microscopes equipped with a goniometer stage (tilting angles, + 12o).

Stereo inspection of plates has been indispensable for the elucidation of relevant details of these bulky whole mounts. It was further found advisable to inspect the negatives directly in transmitted light with a good mirror stereoscope (Old Delft, x4.5), because with positive prints much of the details of the high-contrast plates is lost and the reversal of shades is unfavorable for interpretation. Inverted prints were made by rephotographing the original plates on Agfa Pan (25 or 100 ASA) film, from which final prints were made.

5. Protein analyses

Analyses of proteins from polytene chromosomes and NEs were made using a sensitive SDS-PAGE method (with radioactive iodine labelling) as earlier described (Plagens, 1978). This was done either after extraction and digestion in bulk or after mounting the material on mica. The material can be washed off the mica by boiling in the SDS-containing Laemmli sample buffer under reducing conditions.

II. Acid-isolation of metaphase chromosomes, interphase nuclei and polytene chromosomes

1. Metaphase chromosomes and nuclei

Cultures of both human and elk lymphocytes, as well as human COLO 320 colon carcinoma (containing double minute chromosomes) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines were used and fixed according to conventional cytogenetical methods. Briefly, after colchicine treatment for 1-9 hours the cells were collected, washed and treated with a hypotonic solution (75 mM KCl, at 37 oC or at room temperature, for 15-25 min) and fixed in methanol/acetic acid (3:1) and stored in a freezer (-20 oC).

2. Polytene chromosomes

Salivary glands from Drosophila melanogaster were isolated from third instar larvae in Ringer“s physiological solution (for insects) and either pretreated before spreading, with 45% acetic acid according to Burkholder (1976) or with 66% propionic acid, 66% citric acid (PA/CA) mixture according to Kalisch and Hägele (1981) or fixed in bulk with methanol/acetic acid before treatment and stored (-20oC).

3. Isolation of chromosomes and pretreatment for spreading chromosomes

It was found that from the material that was fixed in methanol-acetic acid, metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei where completely released by treatment with the PA/CA mixture (used by Kalisch and Hägele, 1981, for spreading unfixed polytene chromosomes) or more directly by using only 60% acetic acid, with no detectable difference being apparent. After 2-3 washings (collected by centrifugation at 2000-3000 rpm, in a bench centrifuge) in PA/CA or in 60% acetic acid, a very clean fraction (as inspected in phase-contrast microscopy) of metaphase and interphase nuclei was obtained. The pellet was dissolved in a small volume of either PA/CA or 60% acetic acid, using concentrations of study material which were convenient for spreading.

By this treatment, polytene chromosomes could not be released as individual chromosomes; only whole nuclei were found. They could, however, be released by spreading after the above pretreatment. Pretreatment was also necessary for spreading polytene chromosomes when salivary glands had been prefixed by methanol/acetic acid.

4. Spreadings of metaphase and polytene chromosomes

A small amount (2-5 ml) of pretreated material, taken up in a micropipette, was spread by touching the drop on a hypophase of the following solutions in a small petri dish (about 2 cm in diameter):

1) 4 M urea, 0.1 N HCl (U/HCl) (used according to Kalisch and Hägele, 1981, for polytene chromosomes).
2) Distilled water (used according to Burkholder, 1976, for polytene chromosomes).
3) 10-100 µg/ml of cytochrome c (Sigma) in TC buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 3 mM CaCl2).

The spread material, floating on the surface, can be inspected under an inverted microscope (10x, 20x or 40x long distance objective). Selected material can be picked up by touching the surface with EM grids. The grids were either of Cu, Ni or Au: single hole, slot or 50-200 mesh coated with either Formvar and carbon or with plastic film made from pieces of polystyrene petri dishes (Nunc) dissolved to make a 0.2-0.3% solution in chloroform (Felluga and Martinucci, 1976) or better in 1,2-dichloroethane. After the material had been transfered to the grid, some of the following steps were taken as specified in each case.

a) Washing the grid in water (with or without addition of Photoflow (Kodak): 3 drops/50 ml) for about 10 s (3x) (as considered appropriate when salts are in the spreading solutions).
b) Washed in TC buffer 10 s (3x) or TM buffer, which is 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 3 mM MgCl2.
c) Washed in 60% acetic acid.
d) Washed in 50% acetic acid, at 100 oC, for 30-60 s (modified from Welter, Black and Hodge, 1984, for scanning electron microscopy of chromosomes).
e) Enzyme treatments: washed in 2MS solution (see Material and methods I. 2. 1, with or without detergent included), 10 s (3x), followed by TM buffer 10 s (3x), digested in DNase, 10 mg/ml (with or without RNase 10 mg/ml) in TM buffer for 30-60 min, room temperature, washed in TM buffer 10s (3x), washed in 2MS solution 10 s (3x), washed in TC buffer 10 s (3x).
The material was dehydrated stepwise in metanol, stained in 0.1-0.03% uranyl acetate in methanol (30 s) and either (i) air dried or (ii) critical point-dried.The preparations were ready for EM before or after rotary shadowing (7-8 degree angle) with Pt (platinum) or Pt and carbon.

5. Whole mounts of metaphase chromosomes

5. 1. Whole-mount centrifugation method (WMC)

Whole mounts of metaphase chromosomes, without the distortions caused by spreading forces, could be obtained from the above purified fraction of chromosomes and nuclei. A small amount (2-5 µl) was centrifuged on a grid (coated with plastic film) through a cushion of 50-100 µl of 60% acetic acid (5-10 min at 5000-6000 rpm, in a bench centrifuge) in a microchamber made for grids. After centrifugation the microchamber was filled to the rim with 60% acetic acid and turned upside down causing the grid to float on the hanging drop where it could easily be taken up by forceps. After this, one of the above steps (a-e) was followed. Dehydration and staining were as above. The preparation was then critical point-dried and examined in EM before and/or after Pt rotary shadowing.

5. 2. EM cytogenetic (EMC) method

The centrifugation method is inappropriate for analysing intact whole chromosomal sets (karyotyping) because chromosomes from different cells are usually mixed (specially when colchicine is used); therefore another method was developed.

A small amount (2-5 µl) of methanol/acetic acid-fixed cells (diluted to a suitable concentration as determined by pilot tests) was dropped onto prefrozen mica pieces (3x5 mm) (taken, immediately prior to dropping, out from dry ice in which the micas were laid on a slide). After application the preparations were left to dry for 1-2 minutes to let the cells attach firmly enough to the mica surface. This was followed by three washings in 60% acetic acid, 10 s each, and further washing in 50% acetic acid, at 100 oC, for 30-60 s (i.e. steps c and d).

Dehydration and staining were as above and then critical point-drying, followed by rotary Pt shadowing (7-8 degree angle) and an additional carbon evaporation were carried out. The replicas were then detached with warm (50-60oC) 0.1 N NaOH, washed and mounted on grids (see Material and methods: I. 3).

6. DNA staining

DNA staining with the fluorescent dye DAPI (0.25-0.5 µg/ml in TC or TM buffer, 10-30 min) was performed either before or after the dehydration steps (without uranyl acetate staining). When necessary (particularly after steps c or d) step b was included and followed by embedding of the grids under a coverglass in 50-90% glycerol in a TM or TC buffer including antifading substances such as 10-20 mM DTT (dithiothreitol) or 2-mercaptoethanol with or without DAPI (0.25-0.5 µg/ml). When step (e) was performed this enabled prestaining in the 2MS solution with DAPI, which was used to follow the efficiency of digestion. After digestion the grids (or micas) were embedded in the glycerol solution with DAPI for final checking and photography.

7. EM stereoscopy and micrographs

EM was performed as described (Material and methods I. 4) with the following important exception. EM film plates normally used were found to produce too high contrast, especially for critical point-dried whole-mount preparations. This problem was solved by using Ilford Pan F 120 film, which could be easily used with the Zeiss EM 109 to produce better gray-scale shading with almost no loss of resolution.


Academic Dissertation 1988

Eukaryotic chromosome structure [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]


Peter Engelhardt
Email: Peter.Engelhardt@Helsinki.Fi
Available at http://www.csc.fi/jpr/emt/engelhar/Doc/Diss-Mat.html