Introduction
We have applied the QShock code for stochastic
particle acceleration in the downstream region
of a relativistic parallel shock. These results
are part of a larger study, published in the
Astrophysical Journal (Virtanen & Vainio
2005, ApJ 621, 313; see
astro-ph/0411184 or
AAS abstract), where also the discussion
and conclusions of these results are presented. (Here
only a brief description of the simulations is given.)
We have considered the effect of stochastic
acceleration to (i) non-thermal particle
population, already accelerated at the shock via
the first order mechanism, and (ii) particles
injected in the downstream region
only. Simulations have been run separately for
low, medium and high Alfvénic Mach number
shocks (M=3,
M=10, and
M=1000, respectively) and for
four cases of downstream turbulence; for
turbulence spectral index q = 2
and q = 5/3 with
downstream wave field calculated using wave
transmission analysis, and with downstream
forward and backward waves being in
equipartition. The proper speed of the shock is
u1 = 10 c in
all simulations.
Simulations
In figures below are shown the evolution of the test-particle
spectra in the turbulent downstream due to stochastic
acceleration. Particles are initially injected and
accelerated at the shock front, located in the left edge of
the plots. Contours of log( E (dN / dE ) )
show the steady-state particle energy distribution in the
simulation downstream.
The effect of stochastic acceleration on particles that
have been already accelerated at the shock was studied by
injecting particles into the shock and the first order
mechanism, and allowing them to continue accelerating via the
stochastic process in the downstream region. Injection of the
particles took place in the downstream immediately after the
shock, and particles were given initial energy of a few times
the energy of the thermal upstream particles as seen from the
downstream.
In the second approach was to assume a constant injection
mechanism in the downstream and see what happens to particles
leaving the thermal bulk flow and starting to accelerate
stochastically. (Physically, this models a case, where
turbulent fluctuations cascade to higher wavenumbers and
inject the thermal electrons to the stochastic acceleration
process.) We injected particles with constant energy --
corresponding to the energy equal to the energy of upstream
electrons as seen from the downstream region -- isotropically
within the whole downstream region.
For clarity the simulations are divided into subgategories
as follows:
- Particles injected at the shock front; downstream wave field
(i.e. the distribution of parallel and anti-parallel waves)
is in equipartition;
- Same as above, but downstream wave field calculated
analytically using wave transmission analysis;
- Particles injected evenly across the whole downstream region;
downstream wave field in equipartition;
- Same as above, but downstream wave field calculated
analytically using wave transmission analysis.
Or in a table form:
| Downstream wave field |
Particles injected |
M |
| ... transmitted from the upstream |
... at the shock |
3 |
| 10 |
| 1000 |
| ... across the downstream |
3 |
| 10 |
| 1000 |
| ... in equipartition |
... at the shock |
3 |
| 10 |
| 1000 |
| ... across the downstream |
3 |
| 10 |
| 1000 |
Results
Here are shown the results of the simulations.
Shown on the left-hand panels are the results for which the
downstream wave field was calculated as described in Model section
(link); on the right-hand
panels equipartition of the forward
and the backward waves is assumed.
First (the first three rows) show results with magnetic field turbulence
spectral index q = 2, and the next three show results
with q = 5/3.
The Alfvénic Mach numbers are
M = 3, 10,
and 1000, from top to bottom, respectively for each case.
First the case of particles injected at the shock, and then the same for
the case of downstream-injection.
The proper speed of the shock is
u1 = 10 c in all cases.
(Click 'JPG' or 'PS' links next to each figure to
view/open/download larger figure either in jpg or postscript
format.)
Particles injected at the shock
|
| Wave transmission |
Equipartition |
q = 2 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 2 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
q = 2 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 2 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
q = 2 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 2 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
| | |
q = 5/3 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 5/3 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
q = 5/3 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 5/3 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
q = 5/3 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 5/3 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
|
Particles injected across the downstream region
|
| Wave transmission |
Equipartition |
q = 2 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 2 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
q = 2 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 2 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
q = 2 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 2 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
| | |
q = 5/3 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 5/3 M = 3
JPG,
PS
|
q = 5/3 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 5/3 M = 10
JPG,
PS
|
q = 5/3 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
|
|
q = 5/3 M = 1000
JPG,
PS
|
|
Copyright © Joni Virtanen & Rami Vainio
Figures reproduced by permission of the AAS.
Last modified 27 Feb 2005
|